Abstrak :
This research was motivated by the practice of bid rigging, the practice of
discrimination in the sale of cargo capacity in goods transportation services at
Hang Nadim Airport, Batam, carried out by PT. Lion Mentari (Reported I), PT.
Batik Air Indonesia (Reported II), PT Wings Abadi (Reported III), and PT Lion
Express (Reported IV), this discriminatory practice violates the provisions of
Article 19 letter d of Law Number 5 of 1999 concerning Prohibition Monopoly
Practices and Unfair Business Competition. The aim of this research is to determine
the application of Article 19 letter d of Law Number 5 of 1999 and the legal
consequences of KPPU Decision Number: 07/KPPU-I/2020.
This study uses a normative juridical approach with descriptive analytical
research specifications. Sources of data used are secondary data consisting of
primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials collected through library
research. The data is then processed and analyzed using qualitative normative
methods and presented in the form of narrative text
Based on the results of research and discussion, it can be concluded that
KPPU Decision Number: 07/KPPU-I/2020 is in accordance with the provisions of
Article 19 letter d of Law Number 5 of 1999 as well as the legal consequences
arising from the practice of discrimination in the sale of cargo capacity in goods
transportation services At Hang Nadim Airport, Batam, administrative sanctions
were imposed on Reported Party I, Reported Party II and Reported Party IV, each
of whom paid a fine of IDR 1,000,000,000 (one billion).
Keywords: Implemantation, Prohibition of Monopolistic Practices, Unfair Business
Competition, Discriminatory Practices
|
