Abstrak :
The purpose of notary supervision is to fulfill the requirements and carry out their duties in
accordance with the provisions of the legislation. As mandated in Law Number 2 of 2014 concerning
the Position of Notary Public Article 67, the supervisory task is carried out by the Minister of Law
and Human Rights and in its implementation is assisted by a supervisory board. The supervisory
assembly includes the MPD, MPW, and MPP. The supervisory board must apply the principles of
supervision of notaries, especially for notaries who are caught in cases of violating the code of ethics.
As was the case in the case of Decision Number 235/G/2019/PTUN.KT, in which the principal case
was that the notary was suspected of violating the code of ethics and was dismissed by the Minister of
Law and Human Rights based on a recommendation from the Supervisory Board. Based on this, the
notary filed a lawsuit with the State Administrative Court related to the object of the lawsuit, namely
the Decree on Dismissal as a notary.
This study analyzes the application of the supervisory principle by the notary Supervisory
Board and legal remedies for notaries against dishonorable dismissal by the Ministry of Law and
Human Rights on the recommendation of the Supervisory Board. The research method used is
normative juridical, using secondary data. This Legal Material Analysis Method is Normative
Qualitative.
Based on the results of the research, it was found that based on the case of Decision Number
235/G/2019/PTUN.KT Supervision carried out by the Notary Supervisory Board against Notaries
does not fully apply the principle of supervision. Examination procedure in which summons to the
notary concerned is only carried out once and the examination is carried out without the presence of
the notary. This shows that supervision is not oriented towards truth according to statutory
regulations. The notary who is subject to sanctions has taken legal action in accordance with the laws
and regulations, has submitted an administrative effort by filing an objection through the Central
Supervisory Board but did not receive a response from the Central Supervisory Council, so that the
Notary has taken another legal action, namely filing a lawsuit with the State Administrative Court
(PTUN).
Keywords: Notary, Principle of supervision, and Supervisory Board.
|
