Abstrak :
This study aims to analyze the comparison of criteria for abuse of
authority in the administrative law system in Indonesia and the United States and
analyze the comparison of administrative law enforcement procedures in
governance acts that have implications for abuse of authority in Indonesia and the
United States. This research uses a normative research method with a legal
approach, a comparative approach, and descriptive-analytical research
specifications. The data were collected by the literature study method and then
analyzed qualitatively. The data is presented in a narrative form in the form of a
description and ends with a conclusion in the form of a comparison matrix. The results of the study indicate that there are similarities and differences
in the comparison of the criteria for abuse of authority and the comparison of
administrative law enforcement procedures in governance acts which have
implications for abuse of authority in Indonesia and the United States. This is
evidenced by the similarities and differences in the comparison of the criteria for
abuse of authority with the similarity in criteria for abuse of authority in the two
countries, namely exceeding authority and acting arbitrarily with the difference in
criteria for abuse of authority in the United States being broader, while in
Indonesia it is more specific. There are similarities and differences in
administrative law enforcement procedures with similarities in the magnitude of
the sanctions given, such as in the light stage, sanctions will only be given in the
form of disciplinary act, then in the severe stage, sanctions are given to dismissal
and differences in the provision of moderate sanctions in the United States, there
is no temporary dismissal. an official as is the case in Indonesia. Keywords: Comparison, Administrative Law Enforcement, Abuse of
Authority, Indonesia, United States of America
|
