MENU
|
|
|
| Jenis | : |
KKM
|
| Judul | : |
An Acquittal of Proofing A Case Involving The Keeping of Hystrix Javanica as A Protected Animal In Denpasar District Court (Case Study of Decision Number 809/Pid.Sus/2024/PN Dps)
|
| Subjek | : |
|
| Pengarang | : |
Zahra Mutiara Bening
|
| Pembimbing | : |
Hibnu Nugroho,
Salman Paris Harahap
|
| Prodi | : |
ILMU HUKUM
|
| Tahun | : |
2025
|
| Call Number | : |
345.05 BEN a
|
| Perpustakaan | : |
Fakultas Hukum
|
| Letak | : |
1 eksemplar di Koleksi Referensi
|
|
Abstrak :
Hystrix Javanica is one of the animals protected by the government, there are
criminal provisions for owning, maintaining, killing, trading, and so on. The
defendant of the crime of keeping Hystrix Javanica as a protected animal should
have been convicted as stipulated in Article 21, paragraph (2), letter A of the
Conservation of Natural Resources and Ecosystems Law, but the judge acquitted
the defendant. This study aims to determine the reasons for the judge's acquittal
and legal considerations when issuing an acquittal in Decision Number 809/Pid.
Sus/2024/PN Dps. The type of research used in this study is normative juridical with
statutory, conceptual, and case approaches. Prescriptive specifications were used
in this study. This research uses secondary data from data sources in the form of
Legislation and Decision Number 809/Pid. Sus/2024/PN Dps. Data collection was
performed using a literature study. Data processing was performed through
reduction, categorization, and presentation. The data are presented in an analytical
descriptive form. The results showed that the judge made an acquittal verdict
because there was one element of the article that was not fulfilled, namely, the
unlawful act was not proven. This is because there are no elements of intent in
committed acts. The Judges consider juridical, philosophical, and sociological
considerations to achieve justice in society.
Keywords: Acquittal, Proofing, Hystrix Javanica
|
Kembali
|
