MENU
|
|
|
| Jenis | : |
KKM
|
| Judul | : |
TINDAK PIDANA PERMUFAKATAN JAHAT, TANPA HAK ATAU MELAWAN HUKUM MEMILIKI, MENYIMPAN, MENGUASAI, MENYEDIAKAN NARKOTIKA GOLONGAN I BUKAN TANAMAN (Studi Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Purwokerto Nomor 150/Pid.Sus/2022/PN Pwt)
|
| Subjek | : |
Drugs and crime; Criminal law
|
| Pengarang | : |
Prakoso Cahyo Dewanto
|
| Pembimbing | : |
Budiono,
Rani Hendriana
|
| Prodi | : |
ILMU HUKUM
|
| Tahun | : |
2024
|
| Call Number | : |
345.027 7 DEW t
|
| Perpustakaan | : |
Fakultas Hukum
|
| Letak | : |
1 eksemplar di Koleksi Referensi
|
|
Abstrak :
Conspiracy is a crime to commit a crime, it can be said that the criminal act that
was agreed upon, prepared or planned has not yet occurred. One of the decisions
relating to criminal conspiracy is Purwokerto District Court Number
150/Pid.Sus/2022/PN Pwt. This research aims to determine the application of the
elements of criminal conspiracy, without rights or against the law possessing,
storing, controlling, and providing non-plant class I narcotics in the Purwokerto
District Court Decision Number 150/Pid.Sus/2022/PN Pwt and knowing the basic
legal considerations of the Purwokerto District Court Judge in imposing a crime
on the Defendant in the Court Decision Purwokerto State Number
150/Pid.Sus/2022/PN Pwt. The approach method used in this research is normative
with prescriptive normative research specifications. The data source used is
secondary data by collecting and using literature studies presented in narrative
text, and the data analysis method used is normative qualitative. Based on the
results of research and discussion, it shows that the implementation of the elements
of criminal conspiracy, without rights or against the law possessing, storing,
controlling, and providing class I non-plant narcotics in Purwokerto District Court
Decision Number 150/Pid.Sus/2022/PN Pwt as threatened by Article 112
paragraph (1) in conjunction with Article 132 of Law No. 35 of 2009 is considered
appropriate because the elements of Article 112 paragraph (1) in conjunction with
Article 132 of Law No. 35 of 2009 has been fulfilled and the Judge in deciding Case
Number 150/Pid.Sus/2022/PN Pwt for 5 (five) years and 6 (six) months in prison
showed that the Judge did not consider the evil conspiracy that had been carried
out by the Defendant, apart from that the Defendant was a recidivist is not taken
into consideration by the judge as an aggravating factor in the defendant's
sentence.
Keywords : Conspriracy, Criminal Act, Narcotics
|
Kembali
|
