Abstrak :
Proving a case is to determine the actual legal relationship between the
parties involved in the case. From an evidentiary perspective, an authentic deed is
a perfect, complete and binding means of proof, which indicates that the truth of
the information recorded in the deed must be recognized by the judge. However, it
is not uncommon for PPAT as a Public Official to deal with criminal legal processes
such as being questioned as a witness or suspect regarding the contents of deeds
he or she has made. One of the cases of forgery of authentic deeds that occurred
was at the Cilacap District Court, Case Number 44/Pid.B/2021/PN Clp. The crime
of forgery of authentic deeds committed by Defendant SA as PPAT has been
charged with forgery of documents in the form of grant deeds. By seeing this, the
problem arises regarding the legal consequences of fake authentic deeds made by
PPAT on the quality of the strength of evidence and the legal consequences for
PPATs who falsify authentic deeds from the perspective of the PPAT Code of Ethics.
This research is normative legal research, with statutory, conceptual and
case approaches. The data source used is secondary data. Data collection was
carried out through literature study. Presentation of data in the form of
systematically arranged descriptions. The data analysis method is normatively
qualitative.
The results of this research explain that the legal consequences of fake
authentic deeds made by PPAT on the quality of the evidentiary power of authentic
deeds are null and void. Then the legal consequences for PPAT perpetrators of
falsifying authentic deeds from the perspective of implementing sanctions from the
PPAT Code of Ethics can be examined and imposed sanctions by the Regional
Honorary Council at the first level and the Central Honorary Council at the appeal
level in accordance with their respective authorities as regulated in Article 8,
Article 9 and 10 Decree of the Minister of Agrarian Affairs and Spatial
Planning/Head of the National Land Agency Number 112/KEP-4.1/IV/2017.
Keywords: Falsification, strength of evidence, PPAT code of ethics.
|
